Gotham Knights Recommended Specs

Gotham Knights Recommended Specs on PC Still Not Announced, Fans Worried [Update]

[Update: 11:16am – WB Games has finally revealed the recommended specs for PC on Twitter. The info has been added below.]

Fans of the Arkhamverse are concerned that the Gotham Knights‘ recommended specs for PC have yet to revealed by WB Games. The minimum requirements were announced on the game’s official Twitter and Discord on October 12, with a promise that the developer would “have recommended specs to share soon!” It’s been almost a week since then, and with only three days until Gotham Knights releases on October 21, the fanbase is rightfully concerned with many hesitating to purchase the game on PC.

[Update – As revealed on the game’s official Twitter account, here are the recommended specs for Gotham Knights for 60 FPS at 1080p at High Settings. And they are indeed quite high as predicted.

  • CPU: Intel Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 5 5600X
  • RAM: 16 GB
  • CPU: GeForce RTX 2070 or Radeon RX 5700 XT

    OS: Windows 10 64-bit

The original story follows…]

It’s still unknown what the recommended specs will be, but given the amount of time it’s taken for them to be announced, it will likely be news that many PC players won’t be happy about.

Fans on Reddit as well as Discord, just by searching “recommended” in the server, are worried they aren’t out yet. It’s looking like this situation will be similar to A Plague Tale: Requiem, which has surprisingly high recommended specs, including an Intel Core i7-8700K and a GeForce RTX 3070/Radeon Rx 6800 XT.

The recommended specs for Spider-Man Miles Morales on PC (via PlayStation LifeStyle) were revealed on October 13, along with the minimum specs, more than a month before it releases on November 18. Sure, it’s easier to figure out the PC requirements for a remaster, but WB Games may be holding back the recommended specs after the controversy of Gotham Knights being locked to 30 fps on current-gen consoles.

Upcoming Releases

No content yet. Check back later!

Reviews